memzero(addr, size)instead of
memset(addr, 0, size).
memsetis an example of how blindly following established conventions leads people to doing the wrong thing.
One of the most frequent uses for
memsetis to zero-out memory.
The problem with
memsetis that it’s easy to swap the “value to set” with “count of values to set” arguments.
They’re both ints, so the compiler won’t complain. Humans are not good at remembering things of that nature.
It leads to many cases where
memsetis misused and ends-up being a no-op (setting 0 bytes of memory).
I’ve seen this in my own code, I’ve seen this in other people’s code.
Solution is so simple: write a trivial wrapper
memzero(void *s, int size).
It’s a better name for the functionality and removes possibility of making this particular mistake.
On Windows you don’t even have to write it since it’s there as
Some unixes have
bzero(), but it’s a wierd name and the fucntion is not widely available so writing
memzero()utility function is a good idea anyway.
Go to index of articles.